Author Topic: Restricted Replication of XMRV in Pigtailed Macaques  (Read 783 times)

jemal

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 330
Restricted Replication of XMRV in Pigtailed Macaques
« on: January 12, 2012, 09:46:18 AM »
Sucks to be a macaque! Several people we know are authors on this paper: Coffin, Pathak.

Quote
Restricted Replication of Xenotropic Murine Leukemia Virus-Related Virus in Pigtailed Macaques

Gregory Q. Del Prete1, Mary F. Kearney2, Jon Spindler2, Ann Wiegand2, Elena Chertova1, James D. Roser1, Jacob D. Estes1, Xing Pei Hao1, Charles M. Trubey1, Abigail Lara1, KyeongEun Lee2, Chawaree Chaipan2, Julian W. Bess Jr.1, Kunio Nagashima3, Brandon F. Keele1, Rhonda Pung4, Jeremy Smedley4, Vinay K. Pathak2, Vineet N. KewalRamani2, John M. Coffin2 and Jeffrey D. Lifson1,*

Although Xenotropic Murine Leukemia Virus-related Virus (XMRV) has been previously linked to prostate cancer and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome, recent data indicate that results interpreted as evidence of human XMRV infection reflect laboratory contamination rather than authentic in vivo infection. Nevertheless, XMRV is a retrovirus of undefined pathogenic potential, able to replicate in human cells. Here, we describe comprehensive analysis of two male pigtailed macaques (Macaca nemestrina) experimentally infected with XMRV. Following intravenous inoculation with >1010 RNA copy equivalents of XMRV, viral replication was limited and transient, peaking at ≤2200 viral RNA (vRNA) copies/ml plasma and becoming undetectable by 4 weeks postinfection, though viral DNA (vDNA) in PBMC remained detectable through 119 days of follow-up. Similarly, vRNA was not detectable in LN by in situ hybridization (ISH) despite detectable vDNA. Sequencing of cell-associated vDNA revealed extensive G-to-A hypermutation, suggestive of APOBEC-mediated viral restriction. Consistent with limited viral replication, we found transient upregulation of type I IFN responses that returned to baseline by 2 weeks postinfection, no detectable cellular immune responses, and limited or no spread to prostate tissue. Antibody responses, including neutralizing antibodies, however, were detectable by 2 weeks postinfection and maintained throughout the study. Both animals were healthy for the duration of follow-up. These findings indicate that XMRV replication and spread were limited in pigtailed macaques, predominantly by APOBEC-mediated hypermutation. Given that human APOBEC proteins restrict XMRV infection in vitro, human XMRV infection, if it occurred, would be expected to be characterized by similarly limited viral replication and spread.


http://jvi.asm.org/content/early/2012/01/04/JVI.06886-11.abstract?related-urls=yes&legid=jvi;JVI.06886-11v1

currer

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 50
Re: Restricted Replication of XMRV in Pigtailed Macaques
« Reply #1 on: January 12, 2012, 01:11:21 PM »
Even "limited viral replication and spread" dont sound reassuring to me.

The organism causing ME cannot be terribly pathogenic anyway otherwise we would not survive for decades after the acquisition of the disease.

MLVs are not supposed to be in us. There is no reason to suppose a "little bit of infection" would not harm us.

This paper sounds like special pleading to me.

Karin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 664
Re: Restricted Replication of XMRV in Pigtailed Macaques
« Reply #2 on: January 12, 2012, 01:51:16 PM »
Also, try the same experiment on:

- newborn macaques

- pregnant macaques (and then see what happens to mom and baby)

One might get completely different results if infecting a newborn monkey with an immature immune system or infecting a monkey undergoing major hormonal changes, than if infecting a healthy adult male monkey.

Karin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 664
Re: Restricted Replication of XMRV in Pigtailed Macaques
« Reply #3 on: January 12, 2012, 02:02:05 PM »
And also, am I missing something, or are the results of this newly-published experiment completely different than those of a previous macaque experiment showing widespread distribution of XMRV in tissues almost a year after initial infection?

http://www.retroconference.org/2010/Abstracts/39855.htm

Paper # 150LB
Organ and Cell Lineage Dissemination of XMRV in Rhesus Macaques during Acute and Chronic Infection
Prachi Sharma*1, S Suppiah2, R Molinaro2, K Rogers1, J Das Gupta3, R Silverman3, J Hackett, Jr4, S Devare4, G Schochetman4, and F Villinger1,2
1Yerkes Natl Primate Res Ctr, Emory Univ, Atlanta, GA, US; 2Emory Univ Sch of Med, Atlanta, GA, US; 3Cleveland Clin, OH, US; and 4Abbott Diagnostics, Abbott Park, IL, US

Background:  Infection with Xenotropic MuLV-related Retrovirus (XMRV), a g-retrovirus, has been identified in association with familial cases of prostate carcinoma and in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome, although an etiological link remains to be established. In light of these studies, the development of an animal model to study XMRV dissemination, tissue tropism and pathogenicity is essential for understanding its role and infection transmission.

Methods:  We experimentally infected 5 healthy rhesus macaques with XMRV intravenously. At days 6 or 7 (acute infection), 2 macaques were euthanized, as were the others during chronic infection at days 146 and 289 post infection. Extensive tissue collections were done from various organs at necropsy to evaluate both the tissue and cell tropism at various times post infection using FISH to the entire genome and IHC via detection of XMRV gag using a cross reactive monoclonal antibodies to murine spleen focus-forming virus (SFFV).

Results:  Both methods were concordant for the detection of XMRV in the various organs tested and showed a wide dissemination of replicating virus even when the plasma viral load was undetectable. Of interest was the finding that isolated lymphoid cells and primarily CD4+ T cells were found positive in most lymphoid organs including spleen, lymph nodes, and gastrointestinal tract, while in lung, XMRV+ cells exhibited a macrophage morphology. The frequency of infected cells appeared to decrease in spleen while increasing in the gastrointestinal tract from acute to chronic infection. XMRV infection was however not restricted to bone marrow derived cells, but showed distinct target specificities in various organs. Using IHC, foci of infected epithelial cells were detected in prostate, seminal vesicles and epididymis while XMRV+ cells in the testes were interstitial. In the lone female animal, XMRV+ epithelial and fibroblast like cells were detected in the vagina and cervix suggesting that the virus may be transmitted sexually. While XMRV dissemination was complete at day 6 post infection, the prostate was positive only during the acute infection in these healthy animals, while other reproductive organs were similarly positive during the chronic phase.

Conclusions:  We believe to have established a validated animal model of human XMRV infection, suitable to test its long-term chronic effect, pathogenesis, and immunity and to validate future vaccines. The organ-specific target-cell distribution is intriguing and remains to be studied in more detail.


villagelife

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 100
Re: Restricted Replication of XMRV in Pigtailed Macaques
« Reply #4 on: January 12, 2012, 02:06:09 PM »
maybe the virus does just sit there doing very little.

but add in some hormones, stress, exercise, viruses eg: flu, EBV or a vaccination and maybe these viruses become more harmful.

Karin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 664
Re: Restricted Replication of XMRV in Pigtailed Macaques
« Reply #5 on: January 12, 2012, 02:28:45 PM »
maybe the virus does just sit there doing very little.

but add in some hormones, stress, exercise, viruses eg: flu, EBV or a vaccination and maybe these viruses become more harmful.

Exactly. The Villinger macaque study showed that an immunization given post-infection, triggering an immune activation, resulted in XMRV showing up in the blood again: 21 days post-immunization, there were 2080 vRNA/ml copies of XMRV in the plasma of a macaque (RT-PCR). So the virus had been dormant and undetectable until an immune activation made it show up again transiently.

regist2.virology-education.com/1XMRV/docs/10_Villinger.pdf

bullybeef

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 759
Re: Restricted Replication of XMRV in Pigtailed Macaques
« Reply #6 on: January 12, 2012, 04:12:43 PM »
And as we have discovered that the JHK cell line produces a strain of EBV and the JHK gamma retrovirus, so maybe HGRVs only suppress the immune system, but it requires other viruses to almost work in tandem to cause persistent symptoms and havoc.


If other opportunistic infections didn't thrive on HIV, maybe people with AIDS maybe wouldn't succumb as quickly as they do.


So just following the effects of the immune deficiency agent isn't enough, you have to add other infections to see how the immune system copes. 
BB

Robyn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3303
  • HGRV+ 17 years
Re: Restricted Replication of XMRV in Pigtailed Macaques
« Reply #7 on: January 12, 2012, 04:35:55 PM »
Well what if the retrovirus just hides itself in the body and then some factor causes it to start replicating?  Like stress or hormones changes?
I am a Fibromyagia/ME patient here and all my posts are my opinion and experiences.

“The truth, of course, is that a billion falsehoods told a billion times by a billion people are still false.”

subtr4ct

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 783
  • Just came to freak you out, baby
Re: Restricted Replication of XMRV in Pigtailed Macaques
« Reply #8 on: January 12, 2012, 04:36:23 PM »
Disclaimer: I am not a medical doctor.  This post is not medical advice.  Consult your physician before taking any action.

bullybeef

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 759
Re: Restricted Replication of XMRV in Pigtailed Macaques
« Reply #9 on: January 12, 2012, 04:46:10 PM »
Well what if the retrovirus just hides itself in the body and then some factor causes it to start replicating?  Like stress or hormones changes?


There has to be a trigger of any parasitic or symbiont organism. Without that trigger, the immune deficiency agent may do very little.


I have heard and described ME as the perfect infectious storm, so trying to replicate the affects in an animal model, different from humans, maybe quite difficult, which is why it has been easy to keep the lid on the epidemic.


If we show little obvious signs of infection that any regular doctor could question, how could they possibly know how to replicate the affects. Plus the affects may manifest differently in people too.
BB

Robyn

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3303
  • HGRV+ 17 years
Re: Restricted Replication of XMRV in Pigtailed Macaques
« Reply #10 on: January 12, 2012, 05:03:09 PM »
There has to be a trigger of any parasitic or symbiont organism. Without that trigger, the immune deficiency agent may do very little.

Never heard that before.
I am a Fibromyagia/ME patient here and all my posts are my opinion and experiences.

“The truth, of course, is that a billion falsehoods told a billion times by a billion people are still false.”

Dr. Yes

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1091
Re: Restricted Replication of XMRV in Pigtailed Macaques
« Reply #11 on: January 12, 2012, 05:39:11 PM »

What Karin said.  Also, and very significantly, all groups who have looked at animal models so far have only inoculated animals intravenously, i.e. transmitted the virus via blood.  What if infection takes place through a different route, such as the mucosa of the respiratory tract or the gut, and the virus avoids the blood compartment? 

Also, they're looking at VP62 XMRV again (which doesn't appear to be what Lombardi et al detected), and assuming that macaques are a valid animal model for human infection (of which we cannot be sure), etc etc...
-"Remember what the doctor said?"
 
-"Of course: Grandpa Seth is an invention of my subconscious."

Freewindsblowin

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 52
Re: Restricted Replication of XMRV in Pigtailed Macaques
« Reply #12 on: January 12, 2012, 09:06:01 PM »
Karin, thank you for that abstract and link.

There were several papers I took some time to read, many posted here and elsewhere on the forum... 

Also ran into: Discover Magazine(where I got mouthy (ahem, inputted)on comments) @
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/crux/2012/01/12/hiv-in-xmrv-out-how-scientists-deduce-what-does-and-doesnt-cause-a-disease

I am tired (angry) of "whose" research corner this ME/CGS/XMRV "must be" i.e., Coffin, Miller et al vs. the rest of the world. They sure crank things out awful fast.  I too, love the use of those words "limited"-as one of you stated here or elsewhere-sure wouldn't want a "limited" infection either...

Kinda like when the doctor says "you will experience moderate pain..."

Oh, I am off topic.

Karin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 664
Re: Restricted Replication of XMRV in Pigtailed Macaques
« Reply #13 on: January 12, 2012, 09:35:51 PM »
You're right, that's friggin ridiculous to talk about 'limited' infection' and use it to dismiss risks. First, it's a couple of monkeys, not hundreds. Then it's monkeys, not humans. Then it's healthy adult males, not sick ones, or females, or newborns.

Even if it's just 'limited' infection in a couple healthy male monkeys, the fact is it can infect primates to some degree. Knowing that XMRV was a lab creation that went undetected for decades, it's BAAAD that it has any infectivity potential. Bad. Shame on them.

Tango

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12226
  • Paprotka et al. 2011 is a bust!
Re: Restricted Replication of XMRV in Pigtailed Macaques
« Reply #14 on: January 15, 2012, 08:33:18 PM »
What Karin said.  Also, and very significantly, all groups who have looked at animal models so far have only inoculated animals intravenously, i.e. transmitted the virus via blood.  What if infection takes place through a different route, such as the mucosa of the respiratory tract or the gut, and the virus avoids the blood compartment? 

Also, they're looking at VP62 XMRV again (which doesn't appear to be what Lombardi et al detected), and assuming that macaques are a valid animal model for human infection (of which we cannot be sure), etc etc...

MuLVs tend to infect lymph nodes first. 
"I suspect there have been a number of conspiracies that never were described or leaked out. But I suspect none of the magnitude and sweep of Watergate." Woodward

"I would favor any name that does not impose (or give the appearance of imposing) taxonomic preconceptions on the nomenclature." Coffin